wStoned Out Loud
As the Rolling Stones began their tour while welching on the more than quarter of a million dollar deal they made with my Friend, I started this e-Blogazine journal to document some of my experience of the fallout, and to create a forum for discussion and resources to reform the Music Industry. May Artists, Musicians, and Free People everywhere find it useful.


wFeatured Article


-- John and Ben Snyder: Embrace file-sharing, or die --



wGet Published on Stoned Out Loud

Got Something to say? Are You a Musician, Artist, or Person with an opinion about the Music industry, music downloads, contracts or royalties? Are You concerned about the RIAA and other industries' assault on our cyber-Freedoms? Copyright and Intellectual Property law? Well?

Write an article. Send it in. Get Published.

Send it here: david.c.manchester@journalist.com

(Plain text or html preferred.)

Thanks. Your contributions keep this site relevant.




wNews of Note
from NewsNow.co.uk













wArchives:


-- HOME --



wRolling Stones Tour News







Search for
This Site
The Web

Get a free search
engine for your site

wArticles of Note


-- John Perry Barlow: Slouching Towards Hollywood --



-- John Perry Barlow: Napster and the Death of the Music Industry --



-- Delene Garafano: "Working" for the Rolling Stones --



-- Janis Ian: The Internet Debacle --



-- Janis Ian: Fallout --



-- Steve Albini: The Problem with Music --



-- Evan Coyne Maloney: Why the Music Industry Wants To Trash Your Computer --



-- Courtney Love: Courtney Love Does the Math --



-- Courtney Love: Courtney Love Does the Math
Print Version (all on one page)
--



-- Doug Chick: Don't Legalize Hacking by Record Companies --



-- Dave Manchester: We're Goin' BoomBoomBoom --



-- Dan Gillmor: We must engage in copyright debate --



This page is powered by Blogger. Why isn't yours?

Click the comment() link to make a comment. Commenting graciously provided by http://entenation.co.uk



wThis site is Our Music


This site is our Music, played on a virtual sidewalk. This button is our hat in front of us. If You dig the Vibe, toss in a few coins
so we live.
Thanks.



Support this Site








Monitored by: InternetSeer - Web Site Monitoring

wFriday, September 13, 2002

September 11, 2001 - In Memoriam


Link to 911 Anniversary Page

In case anybody wants to see the September 11 memorial gif animation again, it's located at http://www.stoned-out-loud.com/911.html



posted by gathering moss at 8:52 AM




wThursday, September 12, 2002

Madster sues RIAA for damages - Bankruptcy Court Issues Injunction


"I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight"
-Johnny Deep, Madster President and Founder

Johnny Deep, creator of AIMster and Madster, can be added to the list of those illustrious innovators (like Shawn Fanning of Napster fame) whose genius made them a target of the WTO's (World Trade Organisation) entertainment department, the RIAA/MPAA.

But Deep will not go gently into that good night. He's fighting back. Deep has filed suit against the mammoth entertainment lobby claiming that the recording industries' unfair business practices have damaged him financially.

"The business I conduct in my home in Cohoes, NY, has been damaged by the unfair business practices of the largest corporations in the world" said Deep. "But Aimster and the defense of civil liberties on the Internet cannot be stopped - I have not yet begun to fight."

Madster has a press statement at http://get.madster.com/

RIAA members have been playing a sort of legal shell game in their attack on independent music producers and file sharing services. In the filing seeking damages for RIAA member collusion, Madster's counsel openly challenges this tactic, saying: "...Plaintiffs' (the RIAA members) attempt to hide behind a small subset of Moving Plaintiffs should not be countenanced. Plaintiffs continue to seek all the benefits of banding together when it is beneficial to them, and dispersing and hiding behind each other when it is convenient or when one group of them are at risk of an adverse ruling. The recording industry is the driving force behind this action and it should not be able to duck behind the Music Publishing Plaintiffs whenever it suits its needs. The Music Publishing Plaintiffs have never independently asserted any issues in this action until now. Indeed, their complaint only tagged along after all the other actions were filed. All the Moving Plaintiffs joined together to move for a preliminary injunction and should be treated similarly with respect to that motion." (emphasis added - g.moss)

For the reader wondering about what a "Moving Plaintiff" is, here's roughly what it means: The RIAA will file some motions against somebody. Sometimes it files a single motion, sometimes it files the same, or similar motions in multiple courts in multiple locations.

Sometimes, it is an RIAA member company that does this, separately. And, as in this case, sometimes the RIAA member company does this while the RIAA itself does it, too. Hence, the term "Moving Plaintiffs."

That's what I take it to mean, anyway. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.

The idea is to bury the targeted victim, Madster in this case, Napster previously, and all others in the p2p world eventually, in costly litigation, and a plethora of motions which cost more to pay attorneys to respond to than the average small operator can afford. Like my Father always said - "In this country, You get only as much Justice as You can afford."

In a separate development, Madster Founder Deep has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy - Reorganisation, and received an Injunction against the RIAA and member companies to prevent them from shutting Madster down. So, everything is still going...If You want a cheap, legal alternative to fascist RIAA arrangements that screw the Artists out everything, go on over to http://www.madster.com and get Yourself a copy - it'll make You money when You swap tunes!

There's a lot of food for thought in this case, and I highly recommend going to get.madster.com to check out the full press release and related links.

Related Links:


(Press Release)

Charges Made To The Court

www.madster.com

Madster.com

Get Madster!

Evidence of Misuse of Copyright
URL=http://get.madster.com/collusion_letter1.htm


Evidence of Collusion
URL=http://get.madster.com/collusion_letter3.htm


Aimster Domain Name Transferred to America Online



posted by gathering moss at 2:14 PM




wTuesday, September 10, 2002

From "Napster was Here" to "Work in Progress?" Rev.2


What's going on at Napster?

I don't have a clue. The other day, a posting at GrepLaw noted that a Judge had blocked the sale of Napster and assets to Bertelsman. When I saw that, I wandered over to http://www.napster.com, only to be greeted with the somber single, linkless page that proclaimed "Napster was here." Now all that has changed. Today's visit revealed the above graphic (altered here to repeat). I wonder what's up with that?

Interestingly, the single comment at GrepLaw points to a somewhat broadly worded yet novel dynamic real-time search engine patent by Fanning and others, said patent being assigned to - Napster Inc.

News.com did a summary of the past week's events in "Napster R.I.P." (new window) Also over at News.com, a search for "napster" turned up this (partial) harvest of links:

News
ISPs gird for copyright fights

Another file-swapping site to fall silent

Internet's no Garden of Eden

Is this the way to fight copyright infringement?

Napster buyout blocked; fire sale likely

Recording industry site hit again

Bertelsmann shedding online units

Napster fate on hold over weekend

The week in review: Copyright fights

Meditations on baseball and file swapping

Napster's bankruptcy road nears end

See all matching results (news)

Business
Bertelsmann's chief picks up music baton

Napster Goes Unmourned to the Grave

See all matching results (business)

Video
Morpheus sets itself apart from Napster

What's next for Napster

First look at legal Napster alternative

See all matching results (Video)

Sorry these links looked messy all day...for some reason Blogger's publishing software suddenly stopped offering any "Publish" or "Post" or "Post & Publish" buttons in the edit area this morning when I was working on getting this story up. - 090902 0240hrs -gm

AHA! I just discovered why I have been unable to publish or edit this post using the BloggerPro Publishing software! There is something about these coded URLs that the interface just *does not like*. Once published, You are unable to edit...click "edit", and the Blog entry is copied into the Blogger editing frame, but the Blogger Publishing interface (I'm currently using BloggerPro, but the same problem occurs in the previous version, and in the test version) fails to repaint the editing controls, i.e.

"Options | Upload File... | (anchor) B(old) I(talics) | (spellcheck) | Post | Post & Publish

So...guess I'll avoid using those coded URLs anymore. Still...wish I could delete this crapped up one, though. Sigh.

Anyway, I'm re-posting this semi-cleaned up version of the story because it's easier to read.D'oh!



posted by gathering moss at 7:06 AM




wSunday, September 08, 2002

Madster Reports Consumers, Artists Now Distrust Big Media


Madster runs a Killer Blog

The other day I was browsing around Greplaw, and spotted an interesting item entitled "Judge Rules Against Aimster". It says "a Northern Illinois District Court judge has granted a preliminary injunction in favor of the RIAA against Aimster (now known as Madster)," and points to a story described in InfoWorld. The Greplaw item continued, "the judge thinks that Aimster/Madster is 'a service whose very raison d'Ítre appears to be the facilitation of and contribution to copyright infringement on a massive scale.' "

While this is in itself worthy of pursuit, I discovered something else, just below that in Greplaw's writeup. Turns out Madster is a real Person. So I visited her site.

Wow. Nice place. And a delightful Young Lady with a head for cyberLaw - and $ (Madster is a subscription service, with an override deal for referrals).

Master the MusicPundit has reported that Artists and Consumers both distrust the big media cartels often represented by the RIAA/MPAA and their band of corporate thugs.

Good Legal/Music cyberLaw Journalism. Check it out.

http://www.musicpundit.com

(text link takes You there in this window. Image Link above opens new browser.)



posted by gathering moss at 8:23 AM




w

DotCommunist Reports 500% Annual Revenue Growth


Reading between the Bottom Lines

In a recent news release, "Dot.Communist reports 200% growth in monthly traffic year-to-year, and 500% annual revenue growth for FY 2002."

I guess the internet economy is ready to take off again.



posted by gathering moss at 5:55 AM




w

SC Sen. Hollings wants a Cop in Your PC


"We are committed to protecting your intellectual property
...but we are not committed to protecting your business model."
--ITIC President Rhett Dawson to MPAA Lobbyist

South Carolina Senator Ernest Hollings (not Green, not Libertarian, not Republican), chairman of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, has circulated a legislative draft that has come to be known as "the Hollings draft". It gives tech firms one year to develop anti-copying "policeware," and if they don't, they'll be subject to criminal penalties.

So Republocrat Senator Ernest Hollings (not Green, not Libertarian) want's to put "Big Brother" in our PC's, which isn't too surprising, considering he has already taken $27,000 in campaign funding from the entertainment industry lobby so far this election cycle. Ah, well, I guess it's good that once You buy this Congresssman, he stays bought...so long as You keep up the progress payments. I must observe, as a Carolinian (North, not South) I am ashamed of this narrowmined Dixiecrat and his willingness to undermine my Right to Bear Silicon. He probably doesn't care though...I've never donated a dime to him.

Drew Clark and Bara Vaida have written an article in the National Journal, "Digital Divide," which details the current struggle between the Information Technology industry and Hollywood. It's a good read.

I noticed that the National Journal is a subscription site, but that the above-linked story is available without subscription. In examining the links on the page, most point back to within the National Journal site. I did find a few useful ones to external sources, though. I've listed them at the bottom of this entry.

If You don't like the idea of a Policeman built in to Your computer, preventing You from making backup copies of items, or compilations of music for Your "Fair Use" enjoyment, then go to PetionOnline and sign the petition against this idiotic legislation. (The text link goes right there, clicking the image at right will do it in a new browser window.)

Related Links to National Journal Story

Email:

Drew Clark
URL=mailto:dclark@nationaljournal.com

Bara Vaida
URL=mailto:bvaida@nationaljournal.com

Related Links:

Electronic Frontier Foundation Intellectual Property And Copyright Archive
URL=http://www.eff.org/ip


Jonathan Zittrain and Benjamin Edelman Report On Internet Filtering
URL=http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/


ACLU Site On "Cyber-Liberties"
URL=http://www.aclu.org/issues/cyber/hmcl.html


Motion Picture Association of America Position On Anti-Piracy
URL=http://www.mpaa.org/anti-piracy/index.htm


Senate Commerce Committee Hearings
URL=http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/hearings0202.htm


Senate Judiciary Committee On "Protecting Creative Works in a Digital Age"
URL=http://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/special/feature.cfm


1984 Supreme Court On Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios
URL=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=464&invol=417





posted by gathering moss at 3:08 AM





Animal Breed Zip Code


Design (C)2002 DCM Consulting
for
Gathering Moss


Contents (C)2002-2003 Gathering Moss

for
Stoned Out Loud